Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up
May 25, 2023
10:02:28am
DwigtA2RM Playmaker
Thanks. I believe it. When Europe went all anti-nuclear their carbon emissions
increased.

The fear of nuclear meltdown is just fear mongering. More people die every year installing solar panels than in all melt downs combined. If anything Fukushima shows us how safe it is…earthquake, tidal wave, and what? Like 3 people died?

The problem with nuclear is it is heavily regulated, so there are no political wins to be gained by supporting it. Republicans get oil support and Dems get renewable support, but nuclear, nobody wants to openly support terrible nuclear energy.

So instead of fueling our needs with dead plants and animals (which was great for industrialization) or from shell game renewables that hide the true cost of energy and harness the cast offs of nuclear power, why not just go straight to the source? That seems way more efficient.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on May 25, 2023 at 10:02:28am
Message modified by DwigtA2RM on May 25, 2023 at 10:03:09am
DwigtA2RM
Previous username
Freeloader
Bio page
DwigtA2RM
Joined
Aug 14, 2017
Last login
May 3, 2024
Total posts
1,837 (50 FO)