My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Apr 19, 2024
2:16
:06
pm
bluesloth
All-American
Pro teams are completely different in that they have collective bargaining.
Without collective bargaining, the NCAA can't regulate any limits to NIL money.
Pro teams can because the player unions have agreed to those caps. And agreed that they can't take outside "booster" money.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
bluesloth
Bio page
bluesloth
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Last login
May 2, 2024
Total posts
15,514 (6 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
College athletes determining their own market value shouldn’t be a thing. The
BlooCoug
Apr 19, 1:53pm
They're worth whatever a school or booster is willing to pay them
BigTex
Apr 19, 1:57pm
Yes, but that process needs to be regulated. That is what my post is arguing.
BlooCoug
Apr 19, 2:05pm
Regulating these things is the opposite of “market value”. Players asking for more than they’re worth and then accepting
mvtoro
Apr 19, 2:52pm
That's not what I meant by regulation. My post didn't say anything about not
BlooCoug
Apr 19, 3:32pm
the recent court decisions based on University of Tennessee case now say that
cwilke1
Apr 19, 1:59pm
Pro teams are completely different in that they have collective bargaining.
bluesloth
Apr 19, 2:16pm
That is good info. So maybe collective bargaining is one solution to shutting
BlooCoug
Apr 19, 3:45pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad