My Account
Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Apr 24, 2024
2:08
:12
am
Alan Schaefer
Walk-on
Of course would rather have Saunders. I like Hall, but he is more limited
than Saunders and his ceiling isn’t as high.
I’m on the minority of CB where I think Saunders will have a great two years at Kentucky and might even get drafted. Losing him killed me.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Alan Schaefer
Bio page
Alan Schaefer
Joined
Mar 15, 2024
Last login
May 5, 2024
Total posts
681 (0 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Maybe unpopular opinion. I’d rather lose Hall than Saunders.
acadian8
All-American
Apr 24, 1:36am
100% agree
basc-coug
Apr 24, 1:40am
They actually both have grit and fire, IMO. Saunders has a motor that is
jaba166
Apr 24, 1:41am
Of course would rather have Saunders. I like Hall, but he is more limited
Alan Schaefer
Apr 24, 2:08am
Definitely disagree but that doesn’t mean I’d love to see them both back. Hall
Blew
Apr 24, 2:31am
This is a bad take. Seriously. Without a point guard, you have issues. Hall, is
bald man
Apr 24, 5:29am
There’s a reason Hall played like 38 minutes per game.
MormonThug
Apr 24, 5:47am
Both are good. But PGs who lead at high level are hard to find. Don't see how BYU can be as strong without Hall. Even
roseyscenario
Apr 24, 7:00am
If you don’t think Hall has grit, you’re not paying attention. His command running the offense is critical.
Soupie
Apr 24, 7:37am
Hall much more important to the overall offense.
Tricky
Apr 24, 9:41am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad