My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Apr 24, 2024
5:04
:39
pm
scottpete
All-American
I’d switch. It is a revenue driver for them and a convenience
For you and for them but shouldn’t be a requirement. Can lead to a lazy exam as peripheral pathology can be missed and severity of other things underestimated.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
scottpete
Bio page
scottpete
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Last login
May 3, 2024
Total posts
4,067 (217 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Is retinal imaging worth the extra cost at an annual eye exam?
ausgezeichnet
Apr 24, 4:59pm
I asked this same question to an optometrist friend of mine. He recommended
scottfunkel
Apr 24, 5:03pm
I’d switch. It is a revenue driver for them and a convenience
scottpete
Apr 24, 5:04pm
Retinal fundus imaging is a money maker
WorfoSAUR
Apr 24, 5:07pm
Optometrists in my town would do that because they could bill two ways...
Billie Ruben
Apr 24, 5:11pm
I'm an ophthalmologist. I only capture imaging to document pathology. I actually
hebercreeper
Apr 24, 5:28pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad