No the rule should stay. The catcher shouldn't be that close.

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Apr 27, 2024
2:01:29pm

spidercoug Truly Addicted User

No the rule should stay. The catcher shouldn't be that close.

Report problem with this ad

spidercoug

Bio page: spidercoug
Joined: Jun 8, 2023
Last login: May 10, 2024
Total posts: 1,998 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

catcher interference on a check swing. weird call, but it is the rule

Count Cougar

Apr 27, 1:49pm

No the rule should stay. The catcher shouldn't be that close.

spidercoug

Apr 27, 2:01pm

using that thought, players who get hit in the arm when its out over the plate

Count Cougar

Apr 27, 2:21pm

That is actually the rule. If your arm is in the strike zone, it is a strike

spidercoug

Apr 27, 2:38pm

It looked like the ball was already in the catcher's mitt before the bat

Hinta

Apr 27, 2:54pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad