Dec 5, 2013
5:50:23pm
5:50:23pm
How can you evaluate this without also taking into account the talent
they start with?
Once you do that, you hold Duke to a higher standard, yes, but they SHOULD be held to a higher standard-- they start with better players.
How would you evaluate this? Raw numbers in the NBA? That is far more biased against schools that struggle to recruit than the current analysis is against teams that recruit well.
Also, some good recruiting schools ALSO develop talent well-- See, e.g., Kansas: https://blogs.emory.edu/sportsmarketing/2013/06/20/iowa-state-kansas-best-at-converting-talent-into-nba-draft-picks-ranking-the-big-12/
Once you do that, you hold Duke to a higher standard, yes, but they SHOULD be held to a higher standard-- they start with better players.
How would you evaluate this? Raw numbers in the NBA? That is far more biased against schools that struggle to recruit than the current analysis is against teams that recruit well.
Also, some good recruiting schools ALSO develop talent well-- See, e.g., Kansas: https://blogs.emory.edu/sportsmarketing/2013/06/20/iowa-state-kansas-best-at-converting-talent-into-nba-draft-picks-ranking-the-big-12/
Originally posted on Dec 5, 2013 at 5:50:23pm
Message modified by jkccoug on Dec 5, 2013 at 5:57:56pm
- New username
- Socrates Johnson
- Bio page
- jkccoug
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2002
- Last login
- Oct 13, 2021
- Total posts
- 0 (0 FO)
