who is NOT on D. I'm not looking for some savior for the D. I don't expect one person to make all of their woes go away. If we had Bronson at DE, Ziggy at DE, Fua and someone else at LB, or Fua and KVN, with Bronson and someone else at DE, you don't think you'd see at least a little domino effect ripple over and help the unit as a whole?

The defense can't get off the field, and it all starts in the trenches, just like on O, and ripples it's way back.

The O just simply isn't the problem. I can't believe we just went over 600 and 35 pts and you are begging for more offense. We've had plenty of bad 3 and outs with Hill in there. A loss was bound to happen at some point this season and it would be because of the D, not based on how much offense Hill can put up. Williams and Brown were also a big part of it all and they're out too. It's not just Hill. Obviously we've seen that the offense will be ok without one dude. Heck, they're ok without like 3 dudes.

Obviously this is all preference, so saying we disagree with each other makes no sense, because it's who we would each choose. I'm saying who I'd pick and I think I have good reasons behind it, keeping in mind that football is as team sport as it gets and one guy doesn't change the world, but can make some difference. I chose the difference, even if small, where it was needed most. Imagine what our offense, with some defensive improvement would be like.