Why is it dissing only the B12 when the first CFP info came out the day before and it has 3 SEC teams in it. If you are not the SEC or ACC right now - BE WORRIED!

I know that some of them still have to play each other and it will likely change but it isn't just B12 being talked about getting left out. Sure they are most likely come that final weekend of CCG's but not the only one...

Then they mention "If Aresco (AAC commissioner) loses four of the league's 10 members, he doesn't have a conference anymore." Simplest of research shows they actually have 11 and the 12th is queued up for next year. They played for years with only 8 and even one year with only 7 teams.

They can/will still have a conference if 4 teams defect because they'd then just pick up UMass, Marshall, FIU, FAU if they want to stay Eastern Seaboard or others like MTSU, UAB, S Miss, UTEP if they want to appease the Houston, SMU, Tulsa or Tulane pickups. They say "There aren't enough quality schools available to fill the AAC's void." Trust me they aren't proud or concerned after all they took many many others in the past that were not "worthy" to anyone who believes you "win" your way into a BCS or P-5 conference (Louisville, Cincy, Tulane, Tulsa, Navy, UConn, Temple, S FL, etc).

And then he references merging a 6 member AAC (it would be 8) along with CUSA (it is at 13) into a 20 team league...actually would be 21...

If he is that lazy to do any real homework or even be current why would anyone listen...