Jan 31, 2015
12:29:09pm
12:29:09pm
it's not a subsidy to refrain from taking someone else's money
and even if it were, the NFL has a unique structure that in the end (thanks to the advent of the LLC) is not unique from a tax impact perspective and saves its owners no taxes over What any other taxpayer could get.
The stadium issue is the only subsidy argument I find at all compelling, and my answer is that if local voters want a team badly enough to bond for a stadium to keep it, I don't care.
The stadium issue is the only subsidy argument I find at all compelling, and my answer is that if local voters want a team badly enough to bond for a stadium to keep it, I don't care.
Originally posted on Jan 31, 2015 at 12:29:09pm
Message modified by jkccoug on Jan 31, 2015 at 12:29:28pm
Message modified by jkccoug on Jan 31, 2015 at 12:31:18pm
Message modified by jkccoug on Jan 31, 2015 at 12:51:30pm
- New username
- Socrates Johnson
- Bio page
- jkccoug
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2002
- Last login
- Oct 13, 2021
- Total posts
- 0 (0 FO)
