I love your use of data. Solid way to analyze what is going on.

Report problem with this ad

Mar 11, 2015
10:43:15am

DazeofBlue

I love your use of data. Solid way to analyze what is going on.

And you never fail to find stats that are meaningful. Thanks for always looking!

Report problem with this ad

DazeofBlue

Bio page: DazeofBlue
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Last login: May 22, 2024
Total posts: 11,426 (647 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Over the last 7 years all 210 teams in the pre-tourney Pomeroy top 30

Indy Coug

3/11/15 8:59am

Well we are about breaking records this year.

The Board Idiot

3/11/15 9:00am

I'm guessing there is a pretty good chance that someone from 30-35 passes us up

Walter Bellhaven

3/11/15 9:04am

But how many of those had only 1 top 50 win and 3 bad losses?

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 9:10am

Bad losses used to mean sub 150 rpi losses - BYU doesn't have any of those

dixdog

3/11/15 9:14am

San Deigo is currently 153, but most are considering sub-100 losses "bad".

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 9:15am

So the choke job to USD is the only bad loss

dixdog

3/11/15 9:20am

Only if you consider sub-150 a bad loss, unfortunately sub-100 losses don't

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 9:28am

Anyone with a clue can tell that San Diego and Pepperdine x 2 are terrible.

detmer4prez

3/11/15 12:02pm

San Diego is #96 on Pomeroy; Pepperdine is #105.

roseyscenario

3/11/15 9:26am

Doesn't really matter, RPI of those teams will be the reason they are

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 9:31am

BYU has 4 top 75 wins. Is there something sacred about top 50 RPI?

roseyscenario

3/11/15 9:45am

Problem is beating teams at home that aren't going to make the dance won't

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 9:57am

RE: Problem is beating teams at home that aren't going to make the dance won't

roseyscenario

3/11/15 10:10am

Past performance in NCAA isn't a factor. BYU will only be evaluated in what they

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 10:18am

I don't believe this

mogelijk

3/11/15 11:27am

They explicitly state is is not a factor in selction or seeding. They are free

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 11:30am

So why discuss RPI which Committee explicitly states is very minor?

roseyscenario

3/11/15 11:49am

Your own RPI isn't so important as the RPI of who you beat and who you lost to.

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 12:00pm

They are considering as bad sub-100 losses that they want to consider as bad

CoopDizz

3/11/15 9:35am

Our problem is more about lack of quality wins. Had we had no bad losses, we

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 9:40am

It is only the lack of quality wins; they just feel like they have to add more

CoopDizz

3/11/15 9:46am

I think the absense of bad losses would help justify our lack of quality wins.

Mr. Scoobs

3/11/15 10:00am

The two worst Boise losses happened early and due to injury

BSUbluNorange

3/11/15 12:12pm

BYU can make the same argument.

BYU '80

3/11/15 12:36pm

BSU's were last year, BYU's were late Jan/early Feb

BSUbluNorange

3/12/15 1:56pm

If my team were playing right now, I wouldn't be on another team's fan site

CoopDizz

3/12/15 1:58pm

A single-tasker huh?

BSUbluNorange

3/13/15 8:40am

BSU will be exposed.

detmer4prez

3/11/15 1:26pm

And had a top 10 true road record?

BarraCouga

3/11/15 9:16am

Plus, they factor in injuries at the time of those games.

BarraCouga

3/11/15 9:18am

As a side note, look at seeding for the pre-tourney ranking in 2011 and tell me

swishh_15

3/11/15 9:24am

I love your use of data. Solid way to analyze what is going on.

DazeofBlue

3/11/15 10:43am

Nice fact, thanks for sharing

Cougarpride

3/11/15 11:44am

I may have to nuke some crow in the microwave later...

BaYoU

3/11/15 11:59am

Get this stat to TH

mflood

3/11/15 12:28pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad