Feb 10, 2016
6:49:00pm
6:49:00pm
Those aren't politically feasible, IMO. The ones big enough to make a difference would be hugely disruptive to peoples'
lives (substantially more disruptive than a number of red days a year). I don't see how the cost benefit pencils.
- Previous username
- QuinneyCoug
- Bio page
- TaiJuan
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2010
- Last login
- Dec 29, 2023
- Total posts
- 31,096 (6,132 FO)
Messages
Time
2/10/16 2:24pm
2/10/16 2:26pm
2/10/16 2:32pm
2/10/16 2:34pm
2/10/16 2:36pm
2/10/16 2:39pm
2/10/16 2:36pm
2/10/16 2:37pm
2/10/16 2:42pm
What you fail to understand is it's not that bad is a shortcut. Today is quite bad. It's not very frequent. Infrequently
2/10/16 3:00pm
it is much worse than it used to be. Maybe the legislators will pay attention when its as bad as China.
2/10/16 3:06pm
Better yet, maybe the transplants who spend their lives shaking their fists at the Utah legislature will pack their
2/10/16 3:09pm
2/10/16 3:25pm
No. You are one of the most dishonest posters here, so let me spell it out for you. I admitted there is pollution. I
2/10/16 3:28pm
2/10/16 3:48pm
2/10/16 3:53pm
Sure. California-level emissions for vehicles. No woodburning except under certain very rare exceptions. There are limit
2/10/16 4:16pm
I dont know the number but its something ridic, like in the double digits, of wood burning homes left in UT.
2/10/16 4:26pm
You've hit on the head why this isn't easy to solve. Reducing building and vehicle emissions isn't easy without major
2/10/16 4:44pm
No, I don't care about that debate. I care about whether you think Climate Chane is what causes inversions. And if so,
2/10/16 5:00pm
2/10/16 5:05pm
Okay, but clear up for me the salient issue. What do you think causes inversions and how does climate change impact it?
2/10/16 5:07pm
How do you disincentivize driving. The details are what matter here. New building standards are fine.
2/10/16 5:05pm
2/10/16 5:27pm
2/10/16 3:03pm
2/11/16 12:48pm