My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Feb 11, 2016
2:55
:53
pm
sakar12
All-American
Agreed. And that's why I want Taysom back, but Tanner as the starter.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
sakar12
Bio page
sakar12
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Last login
May 20, 2024
Total posts
3,546 (9 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Despite PK's article, I still want Taysom as the starting QB next year. I am
BYUCougarsFan
2/11/16 11:55am
I just want to win
Sea Chicken
2/11/16 11:58am
Same.
BYUCougarsFan
2/11/16 11:59am
I want them both on the team and whom ever Detmer picks as the starter
BYUheaven
2/11/16 11:58am
I want the best QB to play. I don't care if that is Taysom or Handsome Tanielu.
molodyets
2/11/16 11:58am
Or handsome Taysom or handsome Tanner
byuTX
2/11/16 12:08pm
<< Deleted >>
Downtown
2/11/16 11:59am
<< Deleted >>
BYUCougarsFan
2/11/16 12:00pm
What are your reasons?
Elvis
2/11/16 12:01pm
Taysom gives us the better chance to win this year.
BYUCougarsFan
2/11/16 12:05pm
No one knows how Taysom will run once he comes back and no one knows how Tanner
BYUheaven
2/11/16 12:15pm
The reason is simple. What guarantee is there that Tanner stays healthy himself?
Turnpike Lane
2/11/16 12:05pm
I don't understand why this is so hard for some to understand.
Mizzou-Blue
2/11/16 12:16pm
It is more likely that Tanner stays healthy than Taysom.
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:22pm
That's not the point.
LosAlcoug
2/11/16 12:31pm
Of course
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:39pm
There are no negatives of him coming back
Deleted
2/11/16 12:08pm
I love Taysom but he is made of glass. I'm done with the read option.
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:07pm
of the first two injuries, would tanner have been injured taking the same hit?
travelcoug
2/11/16 12:23pm
Taysom isn't going to change. His strengths will be utilized.
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:31pm
In the last offense he was asked to read the end and give the ball if the end
travelcoug
2/11/16 12:38pm
Sorry to disappoint me? Ok
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:45pm
Totally disagree. Tanner has a gun for an arm but he threw the ball up for grabs
travelcoug
2/11/16 12:51pm
All I'm saying is that the read option was Taysoms strength.
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:59pm
If taysom wants to play in the NFL he will abandon the read option. Ty will find
travelcoug
2/11/16 1:29pm
He threw the ball up for grabs? Look at his turn over ratio.
GoatyGoat
2/11/16 1:21pm
He made some great throws but way too much chuck it up. That int at San Jose was
travelcoug
2/11/16 1:32pm
Start tanner? He isn't close to Taysom with regards to reading defenses and
travelcoug
2/11/16 12:40pm
I really hope you aren't serious
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:45pm
Very serious. You need to watch more football, maybe learn to read a defence
travelcoug
2/11/16 12:53pm
Ok
Backcountry
2/11/16 12:59pm
The first quarter of the Ute game had to do more with John Pease defensive
GoatyGoat
2/11/16 2:35pm
You miss the point. I didn't say tanner was bad as a FRESHMAN. He was amazing.
travelcoug
2/11/16 2:39pm
You made it sound like he can't read a defense.
GoatyGoat
2/11/16 3:05pm
Taysom is not depth. He also reads defenses MUCH better than Tanner does.
travelcoug
2/11/16 3:20pm
So painfully false
Backcountry
2/11/16 3:38pm
Painful for you to be false I'm sure
travelcoug
2/11/16 3:42pm
I have takes to three former BYU qb's that agree with me.
travelcoug
2/11/16 3:43pm
You must be pretty well connected.
Backcountry
2/11/16 4:00pm
Board mail me your phone. We can talk and I will hook you up with names
travelcoug
2/11/16 4:02pm
What was the difference between the pick six against SJSU and taysoms pick vs.
BYUheaven
2/11/16 3:14pm
I'm glad you asked
travelcoug
2/11/16 3:23pm
Haha. Not seeing a middle linebacker in zone coverage is reading defenses 101
BYUheaven
2/11/16 3:32pm
Did I say didn't see him or did I say he got depth and made a leaping well timed
travelcoug
2/11/16 3:42pm
I want Tanner to play every game next year
teancum
2/11/16 12:28pm
I'd rather have him use a redshirt
archie
2/11/16 1:23pm
The chance that Tanner would stick around 4 more years is so low that it's
tony
2/11/16 1:42pm
I don't get why people don't seem to think about this. Tanner was what, 22 last
sakar12
2/11/16 1:57pm
^ - This!!
wilsdad
2/11/16 2:37pm
We would have him for longer if he used the redshirt
davidnairn
2/11/16 2:50pm
I doubt it.
wilsdad
2/11/16 2:53pm
Agreed. And that's why I want Taysom back, but Tanner as the starter.
sakar12
2/11/16 2:55pm
So you are saying he leaves after that year no matter what. Let's have two great
travelcoug
2/11/16 2:58pm
You're operating under the assumption that Taysom is the better QB. I think
sakar12
2/11/16 3:24pm
If what you say is true, Tanner is gone after 2017 season either way
fatcracker
2/11/16 3:16pm
You're absolutely right, and I strongly believe that Tanner is the better option
sakar12
2/11/16 3:29pm
Luckily it's not up to a CB vote. They actually pay the coaches to decide
fatcracker
2/11/16 4:17pm
What's changed?
Downtown
2/11/16 4:50pm
"Despite"? You mean PK wrote a halfway decent article?
pokecoug
2/11/16 2:18pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
