If what you say is true, Tanner is gone after 2017 season either way

Feb 11, 2016
3:16:51pm

fatcracker Walk-on

So why is having Tanner play in 2016 and 2017 so important if the alternative is Taysom in 2016 and Tanner in 2017? I strongly believe we win more games over the next two years if Taysom plays in 2016 and Tanner in 2017.

Report problem with this ad

fatcracker

Bio page: fatcracker
Joined: Jul 3, 2013
Last login: Apr 30, 2024
Total posts: 219 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Despite PK's article, I still want Taysom as the starting QB next year. I am

BYUCougarsFan

2/11/16 11:55am

I just want to win

Sea Chicken

2/11/16 11:58am

Same.

BYUCougarsFan

2/11/16 11:59am

I want them both on the team and whom ever Detmer picks as the starter

BYUheaven

2/11/16 11:58am

I want the best QB to play. I don't care if that is Taysom or Handsome Tanielu.

molodyets

2/11/16 11:58am

Or handsome Taysom or handsome Tanner

byuTX

2/11/16 12:08pm

<< Deleted >>

Downtown

2/11/16 11:59am

<< Deleted >>

BYUCougarsFan

2/11/16 12:00pm

What are your reasons?

Elvis

2/11/16 12:01pm

Taysom gives us the better chance to win this year.

BYUCougarsFan

2/11/16 12:05pm

No one knows how Taysom will run once he comes back and no one knows how Tanner

BYUheaven

2/11/16 12:15pm

The reason is simple. What guarantee is there that Tanner stays healthy himself?

Turnpike Lane

2/11/16 12:05pm

I don't understand why this is so hard for some to understand.

Mizzou-Blue

2/11/16 12:16pm

It is more likely that Tanner stays healthy than Taysom.

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:22pm

That's not the point.

LosAlcoug

2/11/16 12:31pm

Of course

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:39pm

I love Taysom but he is made of glass. I'm done with the read option.

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:07pm

of the first two injuries, would tanner have been injured taking the same hit?

travelcoug

2/11/16 12:23pm

Taysom isn't going to change. His strengths will be utilized.

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:31pm

In the last offense he was asked to read the end and give the ball if the end

travelcoug

2/11/16 12:38pm

Sorry to disappoint me? Ok

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:45pm

Totally disagree. Tanner has a gun for an arm but he threw the ball up for grabs

travelcoug

2/11/16 12:51pm

All I'm saying is that the read option was Taysoms strength.

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:59pm

If taysom wants to play in the NFL he will abandon the read option. Ty will find

travelcoug

2/11/16 1:29pm

He threw the ball up for grabs? Look at his turn over ratio.

GoatyGoat

2/11/16 1:21pm

He made some great throws but way too much chuck it up. That int at San Jose was

travelcoug

2/11/16 1:32pm

Start tanner? He isn't close to Taysom with regards to reading defenses and

travelcoug

2/11/16 12:40pm

I really hope you aren't serious

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:45pm

Very serious. You need to watch more football, maybe learn to read a defence

travelcoug

2/11/16 12:53pm

Backcountry

2/11/16 12:59pm

The first quarter of the Ute game had to do more with John Pease defensive

GoatyGoat

2/11/16 2:35pm

You miss the point. I didn't say tanner was bad as a FRESHMAN. He was amazing.

travelcoug

2/11/16 2:39pm

You made it sound like he can't read a defense.

GoatyGoat

2/11/16 3:05pm

Taysom is not depth. He also reads defenses MUCH better than Tanner does.

travelcoug

2/11/16 3:20pm

So painfully false

Backcountry

2/11/16 3:38pm

Painful for you to be false I'm sure

travelcoug

2/11/16 3:42pm

I have takes to three former BYU qb's that agree with me.

travelcoug

2/11/16 3:43pm

You must be pretty well connected.

Backcountry

2/11/16 4:00pm

Board mail me your phone. We can talk and I will hook you up with names

travelcoug

2/11/16 4:02pm

What was the difference between the pick six against SJSU and taysoms pick vs.

BYUheaven

2/11/16 3:14pm

I'm glad you asked

travelcoug

2/11/16 3:23pm

Haha. Not seeing a middle linebacker in zone coverage is reading defenses 101

BYUheaven

2/11/16 3:32pm

Did I say didn't see him or did I say he got depth and made a leaping well timed

travelcoug

2/11/16 3:42pm

I want Tanner to play every game next year

teancum

2/11/16 12:28pm

I'd rather have him use a redshirt

archie

2/11/16 1:23pm

The chance that Tanner would stick around 4 more years is so low that it's

tony

2/11/16 1:42pm

I don't get why people don't seem to think about this. Tanner was what, 22 last

sakar12

2/11/16 1:57pm

^ - This!!

wilsdad

2/11/16 2:37pm

We would have him for longer if he used the redshirt

davidnairn

2/11/16 2:50pm

I doubt it.

wilsdad

2/11/16 2:53pm

Agreed. And that's why I want Taysom back, but Tanner as the starter.

sakar12

2/11/16 2:55pm

So you are saying he leaves after that year no matter what. Let's have two great

travelcoug

2/11/16 2:58pm

You're operating under the assumption that Taysom is the better QB. I think

sakar12

2/11/16 3:24pm

If what you say is true, Tanner is gone after 2017 season either way

fatcracker

2/11/16 3:16pm

You're absolutely right, and I strongly believe that Tanner is the better option

sakar12

2/11/16 3:29pm

Luckily it's not up to a CB vote. They actually pay the coaches to decide

fatcracker

2/11/16 4:17pm

What's changed?

Downtown

2/11/16 4:50pm

"Despite"? You mean PK wrote a halfway decent article?

pokecoug

2/11/16 2:18pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad