Sep 19, 2016
5:11:16pm
5:11:16pm
After taking in all the punditry, my ambivalance is leaning towards...
Taysom
David Nixon was on the radio saying that the offensive woes are more than just a product of the quarterback. He said it all starts with the weak side of our O line and that is causing a tidal wave of problems through out the offense. Detmer and staff knew that going in and so they went with Taysom because at least he can move and he said basically Tanner would be a sitting duck. I tend to agree.
That being said, I wouldn't be opposed to giving Taysom the first half of WVU and if its more of the same offensive ineptitiude making a switch to mix it up. At this point it cant get much worse.
David Nixon was on the radio saying that the offensive woes are more than just a product of the quarterback. He said it all starts with the weak side of our O line and that is causing a tidal wave of problems through out the offense. Detmer and staff knew that going in and so they went with Taysom because at least he can move and he said basically Tanner would be a sitting duck. I tend to agree.
That being said, I wouldn't be opposed to giving Taysom the first half of WVU and if its more of the same offensive ineptitiude making a switch to mix it up. At this point it cant get much worse.
- Bio page
- gurt
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2007
- Last login
- Apr 26, 2024
- Total posts
- 11,948 (931 FO)
Sometimes I think people assume Tanner would complete 100% of his passes, (RSLCoug, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:20am)
Messages
Time
