There is hardly a comparison. He's had time in enough instances to make something happen and failed. Largely against Utah. WRs did a pretty good job against Utah. UCLA was more a combination of WRs and Hill, less OL. Not all ideal but plenty good enough to make something happen and they flat out aren't doing it. Michigan is not even close.
I really thought most of you guys died off on this stuff after the Utah replay shut a whole bunch of people up. Half realized it wasn't as bad as they originally thought when live, and the other half stayed blind with denial or inability to analyze anything other than stats on paper.