Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up
Feb 25, 2017
2:03:36pm
macaroni Moderator
Uh, 3-10 from 3 nets you 9 points while 5-10 gives you 10. And those 7 misses are long rebounds which turn into fast
breaks the other way, and he isn't getting fouled.

The 5-10 guy gives you good shots that don't tune into fast breaks, is most likely getting fouled, giving him FT opportunities, as well as fouling the other team out.

There is also a different standard for shooting from outside and shooting inside. Bigs shouldn't be less than 50% when they're shooting inside. 3 point shooting % obviously has a lower bar for succes.

This is just another example as to why some old school numbers are so much better than analytics. Basketball isn't baseball. There is so much more going on that isn't captured in basketball.

While you did say "by itself", you also said it was essentially worthless, or something like that. It clearly is not. I don't think we disagree too much here, though. All the numbers bring something.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Feb 25, 2017 at 2:03:36pm
Message modified by macaroni on Feb 25, 2017 at 2:29:41pm
Message modified by macaroni on Feb 25, 2017 at 2:33:35pm
macaroni
Bio page
macaroni
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Last login
Feb 3, 2020
Total posts
35,674 (12,962 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.