was research showing that racial and sex diversity in the boardroom showed increased profits.  But as you look at the article, it really says that over a 6 month period, they could not identify companies that lost profits - so, obviously, not enough time or any relevant data to prove the point.

You have to wonder how families and companies survived in the past without paternity leave.  Weird how it's all of the sudden being deemed as necessary.  I'd be curious to see whatever study you're citing here.