video

Jan 10, 2017
11:28:45am

Hank Rearden All-American

video

Watch this video on YouTube

Surely it was helmet to helmet. Personally I'm glad they didn't call it. Its called way too often IMO.

Report problem with this ad

Hank Rearden

Previous username: Twinblue
Bio page: Hank Rearden
Joined: Jun 9, 2003
Last login: May 3, 2024
Total posts: 34,530 (4,545 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: What non-calls had a bigger impact on the game last night last night?

boogers

1/10/17 9:30am

Reuben Foster launched his helmet directly into Watson's on the helicopter play

Coop

1/10/17 9:33am

Watson was a runner (not defenseless) so targeting either doesn't apply or is

Hank Rearden

1/10/17 9:39am

Yeah, good point - he wasn't stopped

Coop

1/10/17 9:48am

Articles 3/4 from rule 9 in the NCAA rulebook:

crazY

1/10/17 9:49am

So Article 3 doesn't require that the player be defenseless . . . interesting

Coop

1/10/17 9:54am

Yeah, I think that's a change that was made just before the season started.

crazY

1/10/17 10:00am

<< Deleted >>

BYUMizzou

1/10/17 11:12am

Boulware definitely targeted the receiver shortly before that play

Hank Rearden

1/10/17 9:43am

video

Hank Rearden

1/10/17 11:28am

I wouldn't have wanted that to be called. QB got whipped towards the defender

fattycoug

1/10/17 12:51pm

I feel the same way about a lot of targeting calls

Coop

1/10/17 1:07pm

Had the holding/PI been enforced, the game would have turned out differently IMO

crazY

1/10/17 9:34am

Well if you want to say which had a bigger impact, you can't say it was Bamas

scootsy

1/10/17 9:35am

If they (incorrectly) call the first Clemson rub play, it's a 10 yrd penalty and

Still Questing

1/10/17 9:42am

Considering the rubs were appropriately non-called, there's really only one

joelvandyne

1/10/17 9:52am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad