BYU athletics should demand more from KBYU for content and the church can fund

Jan 11, 2017
8:10:23pm

Gene Frenkle Contributor

KBYU. This would be a round about way to fund BYU athletics by the church, but one could argue that the funding is increasing the overall brand.

Report problem with this ad

Gene Frenkle

Bio page: Gene Frenkle
Joined: Sep 19, 2011
Last login: Sep 12, 2019
Total posts: 457 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I don't think the Church is ever going to fund BYU Athletics. Here's why:

eddog

1/11/17 6:33pm

If the church funded sports, it wouldn't be for the fans.

Thunder Buddy

1/11/17 6:35pm

It is always talked about like a missionary tool, if that is the point imo they

IceCreamButt

1/11/17 6:35pm

And call players on football missions? /s

BrutustheBrash

1/11/17 6:43pm

I could get behind that.

IceCreamButt

1/11/17 8:08pm

I don't think I'd complain if it happened

BrutustheBrash

1/11/17 8:21pm

It's not the general authorities that typically say that, fans and others are

basman

1/11/17 6:58pm

I agree with you.

eddog

1/11/17 7:21pm

I am a missionary tool.. where is my check?

RealityCheck

1/12/17 10:15am

Fortunately, everyone cares about BYU the school

BGRTHNUMEGO

1/11/17 6:35pm

they don't fund building cleaning

Cougarealist

1/11/17 6:40pm

No one's ever joined the church because of building cleaning

BGRTHNUMEGO

1/11/17 6:40pm

Some have left, however. According to Reddit. 😉

Polecat

1/11/17 7:24pm

They could do it with funds from the investment arm

Gustav

1/11/17 6:41pm

They are paying GA's...why not fund some scholarships...85 or so

Bonoman

1/11/17 8:53pm

That wouldn't cause an uproar from certain feminist groups.

Y05

1/12/17 4:35am

Not everyone cares about the U of U law school either...

titlecoug

1/11/17 6:46pm

Amen!

BYUHgrad

1/11/17 6:58pm

Still salty about this. The U of U?! Really?

Harrison0Yfan

1/11/17 9:00pm

I agree that they won't, but your reason is wrong.

Cougar TD

1/11/17 6:56pm

That's what the for profit entitiees are for. We already pay the GAs

kotacoug

1/11/17 7:07pm

Where did the money to start the for profits come from originally? Invested

Polecat

1/11/17 7:16pm

Who cares? At some point decades ago it was probabaly donated.

kotacoug

1/11/17 7:18pm

Who cares? I don't know man, a law of god that requires people to fork over

Polecat

1/11/17 7:19pm

I'm not seeing your point...

kotacoug

1/11/17 7:28pm

Point being that saying it doesn't come from tithing is false. It all came from

Polecat

1/11/17 7:30pm

So you're saying my tithes may have grown to larger amounts and I may not have to pay again for a few years?

mulletYno

1/11/17 7:38pm

Actually I'm saying that yes they have grown to larger amounts, but you'll

Polecat

1/11/17 7:42pm

You're saying that funds that once were tithes always remain tithes even though they might later be invested.

mulletYno

1/11/17 7:45pm

I'm saying it's built on tithes. As in, the businesses wouldn't exist if it

Polecat

1/11/17 7:47pm

Are the economic factors in the areas of these businesses also tithes?

mulletYno

1/11/17 7:50pm

Obviously you're trying to show you're smarter than me in a business sense. I'm

Polecat

1/11/17 7:54pm

What if the tithing is given back to the Church after said businesses become self-sustaining?

mulletYno

1/11/17 7:56pm

All fine and well, it still doesn't change where it started from.

Polecat

1/11/17 7:57pm

Not our tithes, maybe the donations of your great grandad.

NewMexiCoug

1/11/17 8:53pm

how do you know?

Cougarealist

1/11/17 8:58pm

None of our tithes? You can say that with 100% certainty?

Polecat

1/11/17 9:38pm

Maybe but they also had tons of property and businesses they sold

Nat Gas Man

1/11/17 7:43pm

I'm curious where those properties and businesses came from to begin with?

Polecat

1/11/17 7:44pm

They owned everything in 1847 before tithing

Nat Gas Man

1/11/17 7:46pm

That organization was legally dissolved in 1887.

Polecat

1/11/17 7:49pm

But somehow they kept the hospitals etc

Nat Gas Man

1/11/17 7:51pm

Also tithing wasn't a requisite for temple blessings back then, like it is now.

Polecat

1/11/17 7:58pm

Technically you're probably wrong. Those funds were most likely donated to the

kotacoug

1/11/17 7:43pm

Technically. It's all member contributions wether it's tithing or not.

Polecat

1/11/17 7:45pm

<< Deleted >>

kotacoug

1/11/17 7:46pm

Yes but it's not tithing.... that's what everyone is getting there panties in a

kotacoug

1/11/17 7:47pm

there's no way that it's 100% not tithing. Some of it is, it has to be.

Polecat

1/11/17 7:51pm

of course

Cougarealist

1/11/17 7:33pm

I just wish people wouldn't always say these things "don't come from tithing,"

Polecat

1/11/17 7:34pm

Please show the traceability of your claim.

NewMexiCoug

1/11/17 7:37pm

It's just that...where else would the money come from? It's a church...

Polecat

1/11/17 7:40pm

How about someone donating (outside from tithing) and authorizing the church to invest the funds in for profit business

CotoCoug

1/11/17 8:18pm

I'm sure that has happened as well.

Polecat

1/11/17 8:23pm

And, who owned the land in Utah before the Church arrived?

NewMexiCoug

1/11/17 8:44pm

Dang dude. I'm just saying some of it certainly comes from tithing. Some of it

Polecat

1/11/17 9:38pm

Or to sum up: Whiners!

Freddie Cougar

1/11/17 7:07pm

Many more people don't care about BSA and they fund that.

BYUtka

1/11/17 7:28pm

Good point.

eddog

1/11/17 7:40pm

From tithing though? If they fund it from tithing why did I knock on all those

Martin Van Nostrand

1/11/17 7:46pm

That is to pay the BSA executive salaries. Tithing pays for the local troops and

BYUtka

1/12/17 6:22am

Not an entirely accurate statement regarding FoS, but I'm ready to move on

Ulysses14

1/12/17 6:53am

I would much rather fund BYU Football than the National BSA.

Accipiter

1/11/17 11:37pm

Even as a huge BYU sports fan, I would hope that if the Church wanted to spend

Martin Van Nostrand

1/11/17 7:54pm

BYU athletics should demand more from KBYU for content and the church can fund

Gene Frenkle

1/11/17 8:10pm

RE: I don't think the Church is ever going to fund BYU Athletics. Here's why:

OliverGranger

1/11/17 8:15pm

That makes no sense

lawking

1/11/17 8:29pm

Two words why: Widow's mite.

(Private)

1/11/17 11:02pm

I think it's more that BYU athletics is already a successful missionary tool and

Ulysses14

1/12/17 4:58am

CB generally opposes the idea; non-fans oppose it even more

ColoSpgs

1/12/17 7:06am

I think you are onto something, but for me it is more about optics.

lilpenny

1/12/17 7:14am

Not everyone cares about singing or dancing either.

BamaCoug

1/12/17 8:11am

While sports (BYU sports) has been seen as a missionary tool for the Church, the Church does not exist to promote sports

Cougarpride

1/12/17 9:05am

wait I thought this was all about the "sport" of life

Nat Gas Man

1/12/17 9:31am

I have seen little evidence that BYU athletics is a "missionary tool."

Oatmeal

1/12/17 9:59am

It is second only to the full time missionaries in how many people it brings in.

BYUtka

1/12/17 11:17am

Are you serious Clark?

NvUte

1/12/17 11:29am

Yup

BYUtka

1/12/17 12:17pm

How is that measured? I have heard this (and that is was 3rd behind missionaries

Martin Van Nostrand

1/12/17 11:36am

From Tom Holmoe in A Cougar Club Meeting a few years back.

BYUtka

1/12/17 12:17pm

Uhhhhhh..... by what measure?

(Private)

1/12/17 9:41pm

Good PR = Missionary Tool

Ulysses14

1/12/17 11:42am

Memphis brawl... bad missionary tool

(Private)

1/12/17 9:41pm

Tuesdays heroes- good PR

Posting on CougarBoard