My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jun 6, 2018
4:57
:29
pm
Scratch
All-American
Yep. Given the TV deals you have to give BYU props for being ahead of 5 or 6 P5
teams. Tough to know how much is driven by TV revenue without seeing the actual metrics, but you would assume that has to be a fairly significant factor.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Scratch
Bio page
Scratch
Joined
Jan 14, 2004
Last login
May 18, 2024
Total posts
12,291 (368 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
The 2013 analysis by same Purdue guy (also in WSJ) had BYU #43 and Utah #46
BamaCoug
6/6/18 4:30pm
Would be interesting to see valuations, with new models
Dr T-bone
6/6/18 4:54pm
Yep. Given the TV deals you have to give BYU props for being ahead of 5 or 6 P5
Scratch
6/6/18 4:57pm
For the lower tier P5s it's all conference revenue. For the upper tier
jvquarterback
6/6/18 9:12pm
Not sure how the P12 is overvalued when no one is in the top 18 and USC is #25.
Scratch
6/6/18 4:54pm
Seems like USC should be higher
1-Wing RCAF
6/6/18 5:19pm
RE: Seems like USC should be higher
Everyman
6/6/18 5:34pm
These are some of the metrics used.
Everyman
6/6/18 4:56pm
No debt burden?
Nat Gas Man
6/6/18 6:19pm
Yes, to debt burden and every other metrics
Everyman
6/6/18 6:54pm
Utah's rise partially due to PAC payout splits? These aren't related to inherent
ordinatuer
6/6/18 6:08pm
Completely. Membership in a P5 increased TV revenue,
Everyman
6/6/18 6:30pm
Iowa above TAMU?...ummm, no.
zerome4sooners
6/6/18 10:16pm
Yeah... highly dubious rankings.
BamaCoug
6/7/18 11:48am
BYU valued ahead of UCLA.... hmmm... did not see that coming.
Samurai Jack
6/7/18 2:45am
Ya that's why you know this isn't accurate
ordinatuer
6/7/18 10:29am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad