I'd go with Jamaal. So consistent. Staley was amazing, but that was just one yr.

Report problem with this ad

Aug 12, 2018
4:48:41pm

sportsbro Walk-on

If only we had both at the same time!

Report problem with this ad

sportsbro

Previous username: Independentwriter1
Bio page: sportsbro
Joined: Aug 24, 2011
Last login: Apr 22, 2024
Total posts: 1,018 (4 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Harvey Unga vs. Jamaal Williams vs. Luke Staley

prcoug

8/12/18 2:29pm

Luke, and it’s not really close.

conflictedcoug

8/12/18 2:30pm

Reasoning? Seemed wonder how others would do with Luke's o-line?

prcoug

8/12/18 2:31pm

A healthy Luke was head and shoulders better.

Metallicat

8/12/18 2:35pm

Speed, power, size, catching ability

conflictedcoug

8/12/18 2:39pm

He’s conflicted.

pt crasher

8/12/18 4:05pm

He had one great year. One. Jamaal and Harvey had better

Jdoc

8/12/18 2:38pm

*because of injury

conflictedcoug

8/12/18 2:39pm

Agreed, but I don’t think you can say he was the

Jdoc

8/12/18 2:41pm

The question was who would I like to see

conflictedcoug

8/12/18 2:45pm

RE: He had one great year. One. Jamaal and Harvey had better

Northern Blue

8/12/18 4:49pm

I agree he was the most talented, but he couldn’t stay on the fields save his

Jdoc

8/12/18 6:20pm

That's why I specified, Junior Year Luke Staley

WhiteKnight

8/12/18 6:43pm

Luke without a second thought

WhiteKnight

8/12/18 2:32pm

But he wasn’t healthy. You can’t play the what if game.

Jdoc

8/12/18 2:34pm

Ok, Doak Walker Trophy 2001. There's an accomplishment for you.

dreamlvr

8/12/18 3:21pm

And, I might add, it was very well deserved. He was the best back in the whole

dreamlvr

8/12/18 3:24pm

Years? He was healthy one year. Listen, I would take

Jdoc

8/12/18 3:25pm

That a guy with that much talent had such terrible knees and ankles was the

dreamlvr

8/12/18 3:33pm

It really is unfortunate. He was an amazing talent.

Jdoc

8/12/18 3:36pm

Jamaal. He played against much tougher opponents than Luke ever did.

Richbyu

8/12/18 2:35pm

Plus he shared the backfield with Taysom.

BYihateU

8/12/18 3:10pm

I don't think there's a wrong choice between Jamaal and Luke. I'd take either before Harvey.

SpiffCoug

8/12/18 2:43pm

Harvey was amazing strength and speed/ shiftiness. Would have the record

claw

8/12/18 2:45pm

JW>LS>HU.

Holy Driver

8/12/18 2:52pm

Assuming the injuries, off the field issues, etc all remained: H > L > J

Wedgetail

8/12/18 3:39pm

Luke, no question

zerome4sooners

8/12/18 3:42pm

Luke Staley was incredible.

Heath Squashwell

8/12/18 3:44pm

Luke was great but the chance of him finishing a season would be nearly zero

HighHorse

8/12/18 4:06pm

Harvey was a threat for a good gain each play

Dan

8/12/18 4:22pm

I'd go with Jamaal. So consistent. Staley was amazing, but that was just one yr.

sportsbro

8/12/18 4:48pm

Love all. I'd go Luke, Unga & Williams. Jamaal is the only one to play 4 years.

Benfica1

8/12/18 4:52pm

Jamaal, Luke, Unga

D.T. Survivor

8/12/18 6:34pm

Harvey...4 year Harvey.

Kama'aina

8/12/18 6:42pm

I wish we could have seen 1 more year for HU, he was unstoppable

pegushin

8/12/18 7:31pm

You could make a good case for any one of the 3

CougarsFanSince80s

8/12/18 7:30pm

Agree on being able to make a case for any of them

D.T. Survivor

8/12/18 8:28pm

To anyone who actually watched Luke Staley play, this is an easy question.

Ham

8/12/18 9:08pm

I watched Staley play and based on Jamaal’s sr year, I give him the edge

D.T. Survivor

8/12/18 9:18pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad