Lead prolific offenses. The counter..my statement is show me ten that did, that werent nfl qbs or who had nfl rb or wr at their disposal.
.


This seems to be the part you and others arent understanding.
In other worda..unless your team has the afore mentioned talent then a true freshman qb is most likely NOT going to lead a prolific offense.

What dont you understand about this? Your example is a fail.
1 10 wins doesnt mean you have a great offense(and we are talking mainly passing,but whatever) Myers disnt srart and play the whole season
.Joe was a true freshman wjo staeted 3 games and won 2
So what you are saying based on your Mye4s staent is that Ty's offense was prolific because Joe won ges and was a true fresan 4th steing qb?

See how your staement makes no sens when you add perspective?

Someone tried to point out Chuckie. That was a fail. The offense was rated 36th,but chuckies numbers were not impr3ssive and the offense was a run h3avy offense all set up by having an nfl running back..
Your usu example likewise doeant come close to meeting the criteria.

Just think about it a bit longer. Your perceptiom of what a true freshman qb can do without nfl talent is incorrect
Now if wilson is an nfl qb..and one of our wrs is an nfl wr and one of our rba is an nfl rb
.yeah we ahould have a top 40 offense at l3ast.