right, the NET is used mostly just to figure out how to categorize the quadrants and not for how a team is seeded. Wisconsin is currently projected about 3-4 seeds better than BYU is, on the average. The one thing that stands out here as the reason is that UW has 5 Q1 wins vs. 1 for BYU. So that would seem to indicate that good wins are probably worth more than bad losses. Also, BYU did have some bad losses in the last couple of years they made the tournament. The committee can overlook a small number of those if there is enough good on the resume. That said, it's best not to have any.