There is something to be said for winning, but 1.5 games for both Hall and Romney isn’t a big enough sample size to say they are more “winners” than Zach. That leaves us the option to evaluate their actual performance and Zach was better in the good wins he had than he is given credit for and better in the bad losses than he is given credit for.
Also, that doesn’t mean the other two are bad, they just aren’t all that close to Zach.