My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 18, 2020
12:11
:53
am
cougaman
Intervention Needed
The difference in speed and danger to the opposing player is quite significant.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
cougaman
Bio page
cougaman
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Last login
Apr 26, 2024
Total posts
68,544 (4,420 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Am I the only one that thinks this makes BYU fans extremely blue Googled?
cougaman
10/17/20 11:27pm
I was fine with the targeting call on Harper. However,
Ungoy
10/17/20 11:39pm
And it took refs Foreeever to make the call.
Soupie
10/17/20 11:42pm
The officiating added about an hour to the game with their terrible pace and
wabluecoug
10/17/20 11:43pm
Maybe. Based on what rule though? Targeting?! No. It was unsportsmanlike
cougaman
10/17/20 11:44pm
He launched, he lead with the crown and made forceful contact to the head. He
wabluecoug
10/17/20 11:47pm
And they also could have thrown a flag on Harper for taunting him.
cougaman
10/17/20 11:50pm
You've gone too far...they dont call that anymore they let everyone stare down
coug10278
10/18/20 8:31am
<< Deleted >>
A Drew Aitch
10/17/20 11:55pm
#2 or #4 could have merited an ejection
Cougarrr
10/17/20 11:47pm
Those would be a real stretch imo. He just got in Harpers face. He deserved the
cougaman
10/17/20 11:53pm
Uh, he head butted him.
rggee
10/17/20 11:58pm
do you think that act warranted an ejecting for "fighting", "flagrant personal
cougaman
10/18/20 12:04am
Flagrant personal foul absolutely. One could argue fighting.
rggee
10/18/20 12:06am
Considering that Harper got up and taunted him, I didn't feel he warranted an
cougaman
10/18/20 12:10am
The biggest thing is they ejected Harper for something incidental and let the
wabluecoug
10/17/20 11:42pm
They are bound by stupid rules. What would they eject the other player for?
cougaman
10/17/20 11:45pm
What he did was technically targeting, and you can eject players for things like
wabluecoug
10/17/20 11:48pm
Yep. Posted rules above. Could have qualified as ejection 2 different ways.
Cougarrr
10/17/20 11:49pm
So you think he should have been ejected for targeting? You think he "launched"
cougaman
10/17/20 11:57pm
What he did is little different than taking your helmet off and hitting someone
Ungoy
10/18/20 12:10am
The difference in speed and danger to the opposing player is quite significant.
cougaman
10/18/20 12:11am
Not much different than a punch.
BYU '80
10/18/20 12:20am
I think it's more like a push than a punch. Just my opinion though
cougaman
10/18/20 12:24am
The helmet is a weapon and he used it as one. Just like targeting. Fights get started with stuff like that
BYU '80
10/18/20 12:27am
Do you honestly think that the Houston player used his helmet as a weapon and
cougaman
10/18/20 1:40am
There were two block in the backs that I saw on the Allgeier screen pass.
LyleLanley
10/18/20 12:17am
The one called was phantom. The other would have been legit
BYU '80
10/18/20 12:20am
Which was phantom? The OL didn't actually push him, but the penalty was enforced
cougaman
10/18/20 12:23am
Maybe so. Refs didn’t announce the number and I didn’t know from where they enforced it.
BYU '80
10/18/20 12:26am
It was. I watched a few times to check.
cougaman
10/18/20 12:28am
Homers? No kidding Sherlock! You’re on a BYU fan board.
Northern Blue
10/18/20 3:38am
Pau'u clear as day had a knee down with the ball in possession
HONOMO
10/18/20 9:03am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
