My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 29, 2020
5:08
:01
pm
Coop
Truly Addicted User
Answer
Anae 1.0: 33.0 ppg, 440.2 ypg
Anae 2.0: 33.6 ppg, 459.6 ypg
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Coop
Previous username
CoopDizz
Bio page
Coop
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Last login
May 2, 2024
Total posts
44,172 (5,993 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
POLL: Which OC ran a more productive offense in terms of ypg and ppg
Coop
10/29/20 4:53pm
Both were suited to the talent we had. We had better talent in Anae 1.0
ZacSeljaas'Stache
10/29/20 4:54pm
Answer
Coop
10/29/20 5:08pm
Thank you. I have been wondering if Go Fast Go Hard offered a competitive edge.
cdr88
10/29/20 5:18pm
The problem is how quickly 2.0 put the defense back on the field
CaliWG
10/29/20 5:47pm
And the numbers were not even close. If Taysom Hill had been in Anae 1...
LEDSFW
10/29/20 5:22pm
They’re actually very close and 2.0 was slightly better
Kajdin
10/29/20 5:36pm
I Got that one right
CarolinaCoug
10/29/20 5:24pm
Yards per play per OC since 1990
Blue Cat
10/29/20 5:41pm
Yeah, Anae 1.0 was more efficient, but efficiency =/= productivity
Coop
10/29/20 5:46pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad