Yeah, Anae 1.0 was more efficient, but efficiency =/= productivity

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Oct 29, 2020
5:46:54pm

Coop Truly Addicted User

Yeah, Anae 1.0 was more efficient, but efficiency =/= productivity

Report problem with this ad

Coop

Previous username: CoopDizz
Bio page: Coop
Joined: Feb 5, 2009
Last login: May 2, 2024
Total posts: 44,172 (5,993 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: Which OC ran a more productive offense in terms of ypg and ppg

Coop

10/29/20 4:53pm

Both were suited to the talent we had. We had better talent in Anae 1.0

ZacSeljaas'Stache

10/29/20 4:54pm

Answer

Coop

10/29/20 5:08pm

Thank you. I have been wondering if Go Fast Go Hard offered a competitive edge.

cdr88

10/29/20 5:18pm

The problem is how quickly 2.0 put the defense back on the field

CaliWG

10/29/20 5:47pm

And the numbers were not even close. If Taysom Hill had been in Anae 1...

LEDSFW

10/29/20 5:22pm

They’re actually very close and 2.0 was slightly better

Kajdin

10/29/20 5:36pm

I Got that one right

10/29/20 5:24pm

Yards per play per OC since 1990

Blue Cat

10/29/20 5:41pm

Yeah, Anae 1.0 was more efficient, but efficiency =/= productivity

Coop

10/29/20 5:46pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad