Making a conclusion like that needs scientific backing. Even if you say "might"

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 19, 2021
12:28:26pm

Mostlyaccurate Redshirt Freshman

Making a conclusion like that needs scientific backing. Even if you say "might"

Because you are still coming to a conclusion. And then you throw it in your title for likes.

Report problem with this ad

Mostlyaccurate

Previous username: desertadopted
Bio page: Mostlyaccurate
Joined: Dec 13, 2019
Last login: May 3, 2024
Total posts: 6,456 (10 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

New strain appears to be vaccine resistant.

1/19/21 11:48am

RE: New strain appears to be vaccine resistant.

KingDave

1/19/21 11:51am

I’m not saying right or wrong, resistant or not. But everyone needs to remember

jordbyu

1/19/21 11:52am

I think the narrow slice of researchers who study coronaviruses have PLENTY

runnincoug

1/19/21 11:55am

I doubt it’s a narrow slice of researchers. Lots of $ out there.

jordbyu

1/19/21 12:03pm

You can't just jump into this area of research with any medical background

runnincoug

1/19/21 1:09pm

For example?

ag4cougs

1/19/21 11:59am

RE: New strain appears to be vaccine resistant.

byuluvr

1/19/21 11:54am

Your tag line and the article headline don’t 100% agree

SJS

1/19/21 11:55am

I don't care. It's close enough for you to figure out what is possibly going on.

1/19/21 11:56am

If you were really concerned, you would probably figure that out too.

basman

1/19/21 12:56pm

might be less susceptible to the currently approved vaccines

Skidmark

1/19/21 11:56am

From the article: “Might be less susceptible” and “more investigation is needed”

1/19/21 11:57am

Funny how they state this in the article but make bold claims in title

1/19/21 11:59am

Doesn't the title say it "might be vaccine resistant"???

cougfanblue

1/19/21 12:23pm

The original article says “might be” and the CB title is “appears to be”

1/19/21 12:26pm

RE: The original article says “might be” and the CB title is “appears to be”

cougfanblue

1/19/21 12:29pm

RE: The original article says “might be” and the CB title is

1/19/21 12:59pm

Making a conclusion like that needs scientific backing. Even if you say "might"

1/19/21 12:28pm

Misleading description doesn't jive with the article title. "Might" isn't appear

beatnik

1/19/21 11:59am

mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna) can be reformulated in six weeks time, if needed

Eric Morgan

1/19/21 12:14pm

And then manufactured and distributed over the course of another year and

Northwest Cougar

1/19/21 12:22pm

That would be very encouraging news. Thanks for sharing.

1/19/21 12:31pm

How many doses does it take to grow another arm?

Blue Ghost

1/19/21 12:32pm

Okay.. let's say it's not as big a deal as the article makes it

byukarl

1/19/21 1:00pm

Wouldn’t be at all surprised if the new strain is coming from vaccinated people

bigbossbyu

1/19/21 1:06pm

Any other reputable news outlets reporting this? I’ve never heard of this site

franklyvulgar

1/19/21 2:40pm

Not sure. This just showed up in my Google Chrome feed. They usually only show

1/19/21 2:46pm

Seems like pretty big news to be picked up by a random, obscure site

franklyvulgar

1/19/21 3:17pm

Agreed. Makes me wonder why Google recommended it.

1/19/21 3:49pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad