. . . and 50+ years later, we are still fascinated by landing a rocket and then

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jul 19, 2021
11:29:21am

BlueSage Playmaker

. . . and 50+ years later, we are still fascinated by landing a rocket and then

blasting it off again (SpaceX) except now we are doing it on Earth and not in an inhospitable environment.

Report problem with this ad

BlueSage

Bio page: BlueSage
Joined: Dec 30, 2002
Last login: May 4, 2024
Total posts: 1,556 (30 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

There were some great documentaries on the Smithsonian Channel on the Apollo missions and Apollo 11...

Coug Truly Addicted User

7/19/21 11:16am

Pretty crazy to think. All the engines were test fired to make sure they worked, except the assent stage you mentioned.

Tesla Coug

7/19/21 11:25am

. . . and 50+ years later, we are still fascinated by landing a rocket and then

BlueSage

7/19/21 11:29am

That's not an apples to apples comparison. The LEM landing stage used the

Dread Pirate Westley

7/19/21 11:44am

And soon the vehicle will all be 100% reusable. Just refuel and go, just like an airplane.

Tesla Coug

7/19/21 11:47am

That's why they chose hypergolics for both ascent and descent stages. All you

Dread Pirate Westley

7/19/21 11:47am

What's really crazy to consider is how close Apollo's 11-14 were to failure.

Dread Pirate Westley

7/19/21 11:53am

Well and had Apollo 11 landed where it originally was supposed to land...

Coug

7/19/21 12:08pm

They missed the planned landing site due to the unexpected delta-v. You're right

Dread Pirate Westley

7/19/21 12:36pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad