Feb 8, 2023
12:12:48pm
12:12:48pm
Even with unequal distribution, in order for pac10 teams to each make $5mil more,
That would require more than $25million more each year to be generated by adding these two new teams. Just assume you give the new teams $10mil a year. So they would have to increase the contract by $35million more each. That makes no sense.
Some people have been saying it will increase the current offer by 20%. If the current offer is $25mil per team that’s $250mil total. So then SMU/SDSU would increase it to $300mil.
That’s not enough to put anyone above the big12 payout.
But if what they're saying means 20% more for the current pac10 with unequal distribution, that means $30mil for each of them. SMU/SDSU still needs some money though. So how little are they making? $5mil? Then the overall payout is $310? So that still means the two programs are additive. Adding them would bring the average from 25 to 26. Still doesn’t make sense.
Some people have been saying it will increase the current offer by 20%. If the current offer is $25mil per team that’s $250mil total. So then SMU/SDSU would increase it to $300mil.
That’s not enough to put anyone above the big12 payout.
But if what they're saying means 20% more for the current pac10 with unequal distribution, that means $30mil for each of them. SMU/SDSU still needs some money though. So how little are they making? $5mil? Then the overall payout is $310? So that still means the two programs are additive. Adding them would bring the average from 25 to 26. Still doesn’t make sense.
Originally posted on Feb 8, 2023 at 12:12:48pm
Message modified by YIsForBrigham on Feb 8, 2023 at 12:32:54pm
- Previous username
- TrueAndBlue
- Bio page
- YIsForBrigham
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Last login
- May 3, 2024
- Total posts
- 65,403 (17,764 FO)
