I really am not a fan of people whose information gathering tactic is to kill the messenger without Re: or disapproving their information. It seems to be wrong headed, arrogant and not productive at all.

If you read the rest of the thread I mention that I saw in two different articles the similar thing posted. Someone who three different people consider a source is saying it.

Don’t you think that absent any other information you should at least try to disprove it before you Chirp