Now that's something the Big Ten and SEC would never agree to.

Report problem with this ad

Feb 29, 2024
6:35:48am

cougarfan84 Truly Addicted User

Now that's something the Big Ten and SEC would never agree to.

As it currently stands, 3 is usually the minimum number of teams those conferences would get in.

Report problem with this ad

cougarfan84

Bio page: cougarfan84
Joined: Apr 3, 2003
Last login: Jun 3, 2024
Total posts: 19,559 (2,503 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Which teams would have made the playoffs under the proposed 3-3-2-2-1 Model

krindorr Playmaker

Feb 29, 4:29am

No way SEC and Big10 sign off

yangpao

Feb 29, 5:52am

Here's an idea. Cap it at 3 for any conference but go by rankings

Colorado

Feb 29, 6:30am

Now that's something the Big Ten and SEC would never agree to.

cougarfan84

Feb 29, 6:35am

That very much disadvantages larger/deeper/better conferences

krindorr

Feb 29, 6:53am

I don't care. I just don't want to see the same teams replay each other

Colorado

Feb 29, 6:56am

They keep over complicating things for no reason. . .

Zoobieman

Feb 29, 6:38am

The convoluted things we can come up with chasing $$$…

Rexy Coug

Feb 29, 6:45am

I am opposed to any system that gives bids by conference other than to champions

Socrates Johnson

Feb 29, 8:02am

That's just stupid. Put the 12 top ranked teams in give every Conference

Feb 29, 7:00pm

This is great... but i doubt it will play out this way

Iki_Balam

Feb 29, 8:59pm

Update on this is that the two byes would be reserved for the B1G and SEC Champs

krindorr

Feb 29, 9:49pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad