You are being dishonest to "prove" your point. That is not an attack, it is an observation. You don't just have "Polaris's word". You have the solid and anecdotal evidence I and others have provided and you have common sense to lean on. You obviously are dead set on ignoring all of those things and pretending that it is just a "He said He" said thing. Its not. Not even close. Hence - you are either being massively obtuse or intentionally obtuse. Either way it is dishonest rhetoric.