then say the debate is settled when you claim one is answered (and again, explain to me why taking your word for it makes any more sense than buck's? how many times is "several times?" when? which players? what percentage of all former players? you say he's lying because he hates bronco; are you just exaggerating because you're a bronco homer?), so, congrats on moving your own goalposts
seriously, is this too complicated for you to understand?
one thing ≠ a bunch of things
vague assertion b does NOT trump vague assertion a
you apparently pride yourself as an "expert" in an elite field (
http://www.cougarboard.com/board/message.html?id=13642631) and claim that whenever you offer your opinion, you provide the evidence to show it... so, how is this too hard?