Aug 20, 2014
1:41:17pm
1:41:17pm
Ok, your empirical evidence is unassailable. Redskin is clearly not derogatory.
Right? Because in your circle you've never heard it used?
By the way, how many Native Americans do you know? How often do you see them? Until you can point me to a study--recent, not 1800s--or some other objective measure that indicates that Redskin /now/ is a wholly innocuous term and has no tinge of racism, hatred, prejudice, or other negative connotation, your assertions are nothing more than your subjective opinion.
By the way, how many Native Americans do you know? How often do you see them? Until you can point me to a study--recent, not 1800s--or some other objective measure that indicates that Redskin /now/ is a wholly innocuous term and has no tinge of racism, hatred, prejudice, or other negative connotation, your assertions are nothing more than your subjective opinion.
- Bio page
- ebv
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2011
- Last login
- Apr 30, 2024
- Total posts
- 11,889 (679 FO)
