didn't make any sense. one second he was talking about how he's not concerned with UH because we get it at home and have better coaching so we win 2 of the 3 arguments there.
then he gets to UVA and says the exact same thing, "London is a horrible coach, plus BYU is at home...but UVA has better talent." um...ok...that just equaled a win against UH, what's the difference? BYU wins in 2 of your 3 categories again yet they lose?
anyway, wasn't super impressed. UVA last year was a once-in-a-decade type loss. BYU rolls at home b/c they have better coaching, are at home and have under-rated talent.