Interesting take that Mack said BYU never audibles, they just line up and go

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Aug 27, 2014
8:26:24am

BYUheaven

Interesting take that Mack said BYU never audibles, they just line up and go

and that results in them running a lot of plays.

I know that Taysom will be calling audibles this year so I wonder what that will do to our play total. I know it will still be no GFGH but it will have to slow down some if Taysom is going to be reading defenses.

Report problem with this ad

BYUheaven

Bio page: BYUheaven
Joined: Jan 5, 2011
Last login: Apr 25, 2024
Total posts: 37,993 (4,973 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Mack Brown & Danny Kanell Talk BYU & Top Conference Autonomy

2RUEBLUE

8/27/14 8:20am

Summary for the lazy?

Cougarclaw

8/27/14 8:21am

It's 2 minutes of audio, are you serious?

2RUEBLUE

8/27/14 8:24am

Serious. Be considerate!

Snipe

8/27/14 9:01am

At work with no head phones...

8/27/14 9:39am

Yeah. This was my real reason

Cougarclaw

8/27/14 12:57pm

summary

8/27/14 8:30am

Interesting take that Mack said BYU never audibles, they just line up and go

BYUheaven

8/27/14 8:26am

GFGH typically keeps defenses in their base so not a whole lot of reading needed

8/27/14 8:30am

yeah, that's not really nfl preparation...

8/27/14 8:30am

The intent of GFGH is to have the QB make his reads post-snap, not pre-snap

CoopDizz

8/27/14 8:38am

I almost positve that Anae said that Taysom will be calling audibles at the line

BYUheaven

8/27/14 8:53am

Right; after last year, they decided to incorporate some pre-snap reads

CoopDizz

8/27/14 8:57am

The impact of autonomy is in the hands of the committee

CaliWG

8/27/14 8:42am

gonna be hard for byu to convince the committee that byu is a 'p5-like' team. i

8/27/14 8:48am

I'm talking about all of the good non-P5's as a whole

CaliWG

8/27/14 8:57am

yeah, i get what you're saying. what i'm saying is that it really is up to

8/27/14 8:58am

Ultimately yes, but there's already consensus that we're just as good as at

8/27/14 9:27am

This is why we need to schedule 8+ P5s a year to be considered a P5

cypresstx

8/27/14 12:33pm

To be fair, we should get a fair share of so-so P5s just like every P5

8/27/14 3:59pm

I hate this logic...

whirl

8/27/14 9:58am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad