Ultimately yes, but there's already consensus that we're just as good as at

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Aug 27, 2014
9:27:44am

Almaden Cougar

Ultimately yes, but there's already consensus that we're just as good as at

least mid-P5 teams, otherwise why would P5 teams not want to schedule us? The bigger problem is not BYU's performance, but the risk of not getting the benefit of consideration from playing hard non-P5 teams, such as BYU. It's more about politics than about performance, sadly.

Report problem with this ad

Almaden Cougar

Previous username: risun
Bio page: Almaden Cougar
Joined: Sep 15, 2010
Last login: Jan 14, 2022
Total posts: 1,560 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Mack Brown & Danny Kanell Talk BYU & Top Conference Autonomy

2RUEBLUE

8/27/14 8:20am

Summary for the lazy?

Cougarclaw

8/27/14 8:21am

It's 2 minutes of audio, are you serious?

2RUEBLUE

8/27/14 8:24am

Serious. Be considerate!

Snipe

8/27/14 9:01am

At work with no head phones...

8/27/14 9:39am

Yeah. This was my real reason

Cougarclaw

8/27/14 12:57pm

summary

8/27/14 8:30am

Interesting take that Mack said BYU never audibles, they just line up and go

BYUheaven

8/27/14 8:26am

GFGH typically keeps defenses in their base so not a whole lot of reading needed

8/27/14 8:30am

yeah, that's not really nfl preparation...

8/27/14 8:30am

The intent of GFGH is to have the QB make his reads post-snap, not pre-snap

CoopDizz

8/27/14 8:38am

I almost positve that Anae said that Taysom will be calling audibles at the line

BYUheaven

8/27/14 8:53am

Right; after last year, they decided to incorporate some pre-snap reads

CoopDizz

8/27/14 8:57am

The impact of autonomy is in the hands of the committee

CaliWG

8/27/14 8:42am

gonna be hard for byu to convince the committee that byu is a 'p5-like' team. i

8/27/14 8:48am

I'm talking about all of the good non-P5's as a whole

CaliWG

8/27/14 8:57am

yeah, i get what you're saying. what i'm saying is that it really is up to

8/27/14 8:58am

Ultimately yes, but there's already consensus that we're just as good as at

8/27/14 9:27am

This is why we need to schedule 8+ P5s a year to be considered a P5

cypresstx

8/27/14 12:33pm

To be fair, we should get a fair share of so-so P5s just like every P5

8/27/14 3:59pm

I hate this logic...

whirl

8/27/14 9:58am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad