the ref should have made the call precisely BECAUSE of the time and score.

Oct 6, 2015
8:44:58am

smokymountainrain

You could have a point - one I would still disagree with - if there were 10 seconds to play and one team were up by 60. Because the score was close and the game hung in the balance, is the exact reason he shouldn't have swallowed his whistle.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 8:44:58am

Message modified by smokymountainrain on Oct 6, 2015 at 8:46:34am

Message modified by smokymountainrain on Oct 6, 2015 at 8:46:54am

Report problem with this ad

smokymountainrain

Previous username: travishansensucks
New username: smr
Bio page: smokymountainrain
Joined: Dec 14, 2006
Last login: Jul 3, 2019
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Just saw the blown call from the game last night.

RichieRich

10/6/15 8:10am

While what you say is true

Sea Chicken

10/6/15 8:13am

And for the record, I know who Efren Herrera is

Sea Chicken

10/6/15 8:14am

Sorry, I zorned out for a minute. Who did you say?

Indy Coug

10/6/15 8:16am

I would have a great comeback

Sea Chicken

10/6/15 8:30am

Not a dumb rule at all.

foofcoug

10/6/15 8:16am

Exactly, what if a Lions player had been about to fall on the ball? Lions ball

hansel

10/6/15 8:27am

That doesn't explain why it is a good rule

Sea Chicken

10/6/15 8:28am

Apparently the competition committee has determined that the game is better

hansel

10/6/15 8:32am

adding to the intrigue of players scrambling to recover a ball in the field is

travelcoug

10/6/15 9:30am

Seriously. As evidenced by many onside kicks or muffed punts, when

LiveCoug

10/6/15 8:53am

There are plenty of questionable rules, but that was a joke. I would bet the

RichieRich

10/6/15 8:16am

Irrelevant. Rules are rules

spugeddy24

10/6/15 9:35am

My reply. Sometimes its better to be lucky than good

Zenoch

10/6/15 8:14am

The coaches and players not knowing the rule is understandable.

RichieRich

10/6/15 8:17am

They fumbled on the 1. They deserved to lose.

tank

10/6/15 8:14am

Or the Hawks deserved to lose because they turned a great Chancellor play into

RichieRich

10/6/15 8:19am

So the problem is he was a defender and batted and not kicked the ball?

SpiffCoug

10/6/15 8:15am

That's a penalty too. It results in a safety because the penalty occurred in

foofcoug

10/6/15 8:17am

Pretty sure if a punter does that, it's a penalty

jbcoug

10/6/15 8:21am

Yeah, I imagine the Lions would have gladly taken 2 points and the ball back

smokymountainrain

10/6/15 8:26am

Meh. The ball was going out whether the guy touched it or not. I think calling

Broda

10/6/15 8:23am

So, the officials should pick and choose which rules to enforce?

RichieRich

10/6/15 8:25am

I'm not a fan of the "what would affect the game more?" calculus

jbcoug

10/6/15 8:26am

I'm sure the ref was not calculating that in his head. I think he missed the

Broda

10/6/15 8:32am

Regarding your basketball comparison:

smokymountainrain

10/6/15 8:35am

Thanks for the laugh. Steve Young and Ray Lewis both were wondering when that

Broda

10/6/15 8:48am

It actually gets called all the time.

The Dude Abides

10/6/15 9:51am

All the time? I've never seen it called. Ever.

Broda

10/6/15 10:02am

Haha you've never seen a punter kick the ball out the back of the end zone when

The Dude Abides

10/6/15 10:07am

Yes, I've seen that. Never seen a flag thrown because of it.

Broda

10/6/15 10:14am

Weird. I've never seen them miss it when the punter does it.

The Dude Abides

10/6/15 10:17am

I've seen it called several times on onside kicks where the receiving team

foofcoug

10/6/15 10:16am

Yes, that's the exact equivalence to lighting tapping a ball that was already

Left Shark Coug

10/6/15 9:45am

Your basketball example is exactly why this shouldn't happen

jbcoug

10/6/15 8:35am

lol. that's ridiculous. Let's not call that late hit, targeting

smokymountainrain

10/6/15 8:29am

Wow I am so glad I have you to interpret what I say. Thank you.

Broda

10/6/15 8:35am

the ref should have made the call precisely BECAUSE of the time and score.

smokymountainrain

10/6/15 8:44am

Refs, especially replay refs, shouldn't be running their own court of equity.

byutx

10/6/15 8:44am

Zero chance? no. Low? Sure. But the bat affected the ball and therefore the

LiveCoug

10/6/15 8:54am

I'm always a fan of consistent application of the rules. If he broke the rule

Bro

10/6/15 8:37am

I echo Steve Young and Ray Lewis. They seemed bewildered about that rule

coug203

10/6/15 9:44am

It is. It wasn't when Steve Young played. Ray should know it.

The Dude Abides

10/6/15 9:54am

False. It was a rule when Steve Young played, yet he had no idea.

Broda

10/6/15 10:01am

That's because it would result in a safety when he did it, which is

chago04

10/6/15 10:05am

Hmm for some reason I thought it changed about 10 years ago. Must be wrong.

The Dude Abides

10/6/15 10:09am

Steve and Ray specifically asked the old official guy last night when the rule

Broda

10/6/15 10:18am

Ah. Guess it's been longer than I thought. Time flies.

The Dude Abides

10/6/15 10:25am

he had a lot of concussions, so relying on his memory to determine anything

Posting on CougarBoard