Jul 20, 2015
1:51:36pm
The 5% solution
even if it's a small change it might impact a lot of different areas and amount to a big change overall.

Case in point, 100 yrs ago some geniuses decided the wolves in Yellowstone park needed to be eliminated (because wolves are evil), so they were all hunted and trapped out.

In a short time the Elk population exploded in Yellowstone and they overgrazed eating all the saplings and killing new tree growth. Pretty soon forestation declined to a fraction of what it once was. This caused erosion problems with waterways and impacted the beaver population and threw them into serious decline which then reduced the number of marshy wetland areas that moose, martens etc thrived in.

The lack of wolves allowed coyotes to flourish, who in their turn, naturally suppress antelopes and small deer as well as foxes, who eat ground nesting birds, rodents, etc. These changes affect how often certain roots, buds, seeds and insects get eaten, which can alter the balance of local plant communities, and so on down the food chain all the way to fungi and microbes.

Now that they introduced wolves back into Yellowstone 20 yrs ago Park Rangers are finding it difficult to re-establish that natural equilibrium that existed between all the species of animals and plant life. That's been a huge overall impact that stemmed from one small change.

I think the effects from this one change (hiring Wintrich) will be seen in a lot of different ways down the road.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Jul 20, 2015 at 1:51:36pm
Message modified by icecougar on Jul 20, 2015 at 1:53:56pm
icecougar
Bio page
icecougar
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Last login
May 15, 2024
Total posts
40,592 (330 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.