I would have that 'in the top 25' dependent on the AP top 25 to prevent this

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Oct 19, 2017
4:47:07pm

Dissenter Walk-on

I would have that 'in the top 25' dependent on the AP top 25 to prevent this

Report problem with this ad

Dissenter

Previous username: nlawyer
New username: 459873495872345
Bio page: Dissenter
Joined: Jul 18, 2011
Last login: Aug 31, 2019
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Playoff expansion proposal

Dissenter

10/19/17 12:32pm

Let the best G5 champ earn an at-large spot. Why do they deserve a guaranteed

Martin Van Nostrand

10/19/17 12:36pm

Based on the system messing them I say they get the one spot. 7 for P5 is enough.

10/19/17 12:38pm

The whole point of my proposal is to get rid of P5/G5.

Dissenter

10/19/17 12:47pm

In that case, no auto-bids. Top 8 are in.

10/19/17 1:56pm

The issue is, left to a committee, the G5 champion would never “earn” a spot

10/19/17 12:54pm

I vote yes.

Return of the Yeti

10/19/17 12:41pm

I vote yes too, but P-5 conferences will vote no. Also I have no veto power.

10/19/17 12:47pm

They really shouldn't, they'd get 7/8 almost every year

Dissenter

10/19/17 12:48pm

Letting in #13/#18/#25 over their up to 17 higher ranked teams is hard + $s

10/19/17 12:58pm

What about when 9-3 Wisconsin wins the Big10?

Dissenter

10/19/17 4:46pm

Out of every proposal I have seen, I think this makes the most sense.

bscores2

10/19/17 12:52pm

It's a good proposal, but expect gamesmanship with G5's getting ranked

Gil Buckman

10/19/17 1:08pm

I would have that 'in the top 25' dependent on the AP top 25 to prevent this

Dissenter

10/19/17 4:47pm

1) it can't expand under the current contract 2) P5 isn't some made up thing it

Nat Gas Man

10/19/17 1:16pm

Definitely wouldn't happen voluntarily, would require legal or congressional act

Gil Buckman

10/19/17 1:18pm

Take the top 8. If a P5 gets three teams in, so be it. If a G5 program

10/19/17 2:00pm

Subjective rankings are not, in any stretch of the imagination, 'fair'

Dissenter

10/19/17 4:48pm

What is fair? Excluding a team that had a great season for some pissant G5

10/20/17 6:05pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad