days to increase his compensation to what he thought it should be. Three months later he met with them, they said no, and he quit on the spot.
I have no problem with him walking away just as I have no problem with teachers walking out.
The question I have, is why is the free market crowd ok with the CEO's power play but not with the teachers'? The principles are the same either way.
We all have different types of leverage. Why not use what you have to get what you want (within certain ethical boundaries of course)?