Aug 20, 2019
5:25:10am
5:25:10am
If given the option directly to have a small percrntage of unseen and unknowable
growth not be there and directly benefit the lives of untold many many many line workers, I think the answer is obvious.
I think by now we should know that companies often virtue signal one way, but end up completely the opposite direction.
Till i see profit sharing with non stock owning hourly employees, I'll go ahead and not believe a lot of rhetoric.
If they are going the global conservation route against shareholders, I am equally skeptical.
For now its just a PR play.
I think by now we should know that companies often virtue signal one way, but end up completely the opposite direction.
Till i see profit sharing with non stock owning hourly employees, I'll go ahead and not believe a lot of rhetoric.
If they are going the global conservation route against shareholders, I am equally skeptical.
For now its just a PR play.
- Bio page
- rtNelson
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Last login
- Apr 28, 2024
- Total posts
- 9,836 (38 FO)
Messages
Time
Nearly 200 CEOs signed a letter promising that shareholder value will no longer be their first priority. It's a major
8/19/19 11:32pm
8/19/19 11:46pm
I thought about this too... I still think that for one company, one CEO, the best thing for those shareholders would
8/19/19 11:56pm
8/20/19 12:02am
8/20/19 6:45am