I’ll be inclined to say people blossom later if the current field

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Sep 6, 2019
9:17:29pm

bluecougar1985 Playmaker

I’ll be inclined to say people blossom later if the current field

starts dominating around 28-30 and that continues for 5-7 years. However, I’m more inclined to believe in the next couple years a new crop will emerge and guys you just mentioned never succeed beyond 1 or maybe 2 majors. To me that would prove that the last 5 years have seriously inflated Nadal and Djokovic numbers.

Report problem with this ad

bluecougar1985

Bio page: bluecougar1985
Joined: Dec 10, 2015
Last login: May 3, 2024
Total posts: 15,603 (1,565 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Is it possible that men’s tennis will never see a major won by a player born in

9/6/19 7:59pm

So hard to overcome that experience

Pony Zale

9/6/19 8:15pm

Sure, but every up and coming generation has to beat those things.

9/6/19 8:29pm

The Big 4 killed off the previous generation also

Pony Zale

9/6/19 8:50pm

I’ll be inclined to say people blossom later if the current field

9/6/19 9:17pm

How is that any different than the era of Roddick & Hewitt?

Pony Zale

9/6/19 9:47pm

Exactly, the weakest generation ever was the one just before Nadal and later

chilango

9/6/19 10:04pm

The big difference is that Federer was the same age as those guys.

9/6/19 10:13pm

I think you are just mad Nadal is going to pass Fed's slam total

Pony Zale

9/6/19 10:30pm

Djokovic likely does pass both, besides that, that’s an unfair statement.

9/6/19 10:46pm

Also, with Nadal’s injury history there is no guarantee beyond next week.

9/6/19 10:47pm

Or, imagine how many fewer he would have if Nadal and Djoker were a few years

chilango

9/6/19 11:12pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad