So compensate even fewer of the athletes who generate billions in revenue?

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Dec 8, 2019
7:25:32pm

ryebrye Playmaker

So compensate even fewer of the athletes who generate billions in revenue?

Report problem with this ad

ryebrye

Bio page: ryebrye
Joined: Dec 13, 2015
Last login: May 2, 2024
Total posts: 8,176 (3 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Scholarship limits were introduced in 1973, and dropped from 105 to 85 by 1992.

chilango

12/8/19 4:56pm

I think that it might have that affect as well...

CoachSpeak

12/8/19 5:06pm

Your second paragraph is key. The reduced football schollies need to be

chilango

12/8/19 5:09pm

It’s a great point. With 130 D1 teams, reducing Schollies by just

BoiseBlue

12/8/19 6:29pm

Unless you award those scholarships to student-athletes in other sports.

chilango

12/8/19 7:32pm

It sounds like reducing it to 85 went too far.

Y05

12/8/19 5:38pm

The schollies were reduced in steps, not in one fell swoop. All of the schools I

chilango

12/8/19 6:11pm

So compensate even fewer of the athletes who generate billions in revenue?

ryebrye

12/8/19 7:25pm

They wouldn’t be generating revenue if they’re not there.

chilango

12/8/19 7:34pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad