More nuanced. Maybe not overtly but they'll pour more money into refining

Jan 22, 2020
7:44:39am

runnincoug All-American

Current cash cows than seeking new ones that will be less profitable. Hence public money should support research and big pharma laws reformed so they hold patents for less long. Because their "research" will serve them first and public second

Report problem with this ad

runnincoug

Bio page: runnincoug
Joined: May 26, 2011
Last login: May 20, 2024
Total posts: 33,650 (2,571 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: Do you believe drug companies are are reluctant to sell cancer cures because they make more money treating them than curing them?

Slim Broscience major

1/22/20 7:36am

Oh for sure. They aren't competitive with each other and hold back patents so each

Baron

1/22/20 7:40am

Well when you say it like that 🙂

Solomon Levi

1/22/20 1:54pm

They won't sell them, but they make sure family members with cancer

DapperDan

1/22/20 7:40am

Remember the stories about the "100 MPG carburetor" or "car that runs on water"?

Dread Pirate Westley

1/22/20 7:41am

Reminded me of the exact same thing. That silly water engine.

Slim

1/22/20 7:42am

Or cold fusion?

ochobeeguy

1/22/20 9:02am

I heard about the car engine using magnets that OPEC killed. I believed that much longer than I should have.

shimmy

1/22/20 9:18am

You have to be extra susceptible to conspiracy theory belief to think that any company would sit on some sort

Byron McNertney

1/22/20 9:37am

Similarly correlated poll: do you wear a tinfoil hat or not

JONBOY

1/22/20 7:41am

More nuanced. Maybe not overtly but they'll pour more money into refining

runnincoug

1/22/20 7:44am

that seems like a critique of capitalism more than drug companies

Linescratcher

1/22/20 7:48am

...or overreaching govt regulations?

StarMan

1/22/20 8:56am

^^Doesn't realize patents are govt monopolies and are the opposite of capitalism

jvquarterback

1/22/20 9:15am

That's an interesting point of view. I'd be curious to see poll results

Linescratcher

1/22/20 9:40am

What, what? You want to see how much innovation occurs, especially in pharmaceuticals without patents?

AD4

1/22/20 9:51am

Patents have a negative effect on innovation in most cases.

jvquarterback

1/22/20 10:57am

Link to those studies?

AD4

1/22/20 12:29pm

Here you go.

jvquarterback

1/22/20 1:17pm

Interesting. Here's an article that refers to some of the same research that your paper uses, but comes to a very

Byron McNertney

1/22/20 3:19pm

Here are the studies actually referenced in the third paragraph:

jvquarterback

1/22/20 3:53pm

Thanks for sharing.

sanitarium

1/22/20 4:12pm

Maybe the heart companies will cure cancer than everyone can

cougfanz

1/22/20 7:51am

My question if they find a cure is how much will treatment cost?

4th and Niner

1/22/20 7:49am

They will treat it like hepc cures but magnified. It's going to be EXPENSIVE

Slim

1/22/20 7:53am

I'm 100% convinced there's a cure out there that's kept under wraps

RockyBalboa

1/22/20 8:00am

Look at what happened with Gilead and Hep C. They found a cure but the cost was $128k per treatment,

chago04

1/22/20 8:06am

Yeah, but that is Hep C. You think curing cancer would be make money?

shimmy

1/22/20 9:17am

I do, especially for the smaller companies. They would make billions if not trillions.

chago04

1/22/20 9:30am

I dunno, Toasterchive has been to seminars that say differently. I just don't know if there is enough demand in a cure.

shimmy

1/22/20 9:40am

How much does Gardisil cost? There's your cure for 98% of cervical, anal and H&N

jvquarterback

1/22/20 9:21am

This poll is depressing. I don't even know where to start.

Y'zcrack

1/22/20 11:52am

Businesses care about one thing: maximizing shareholder value

Posting on CougarBoard