...to them at that age based on all available data. Unless you somehow have better data to share. Better data isn't an outlier anecdote - by the way. Better data is some data that actually shows that COVID is dangerous for more than 0.001% 18-24 year old. In Utah, for instance, the only person in that age bracket that has died was recovering from cancer and heart disease.

Assuming you don't have better information (since it doesn't exist) then calling it disinformation rather than a slight exaggeration is itself disinformation in my opinion.