Nov 13, 2021
8:01:42pm
8:01:42pm
Is Sark considered a “great coach” or not? If he’s such a great coach… please explain how they can suck so bad with
great talent? Great talent doesn’t always mean the best team.
If it’s all about coaching then Texas would be all world based on Sarks brand as a great coach — right? But because it’s more than coaching, it’s out of his hands. How does a “great coach” lose to a bad Kansas team at home?
If it’s all about coaching then Texas would be all world based on Sarks brand as a great coach — right? But because it’s more than coaching, it’s out of his hands. How does a “great coach” lose to a bad Kansas team at home?
- Previous username
- CB4
- Bio page
- Zach Morris
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2009
- Last login
- May 30, 2024
- Total posts
- 42,687 (13,906 FO)
Messages
Time
This Texas game is a very good example of how coaches get way too much credit and way too much blame for wins & losses.
11/13/21 7:51pm
11/13/21 7:54pm
11/13/21 7:58pm
Is Sark considered a “great coach” or not? If he’s such a great coach… please explain how they can suck so bad with
11/13/21 8:01pm
11/13/21 8:02pm
11/13/21 8:05pm
11/13/21 8:08pm
How is that a counterpoint? It proves my point. Sark was so highly thought of as a “great coach” that TX threw huge
11/13/21 7:59pm
11/13/21 8:01pm
As mentioned in the OP, there are other pieces to the puzzle. Team chemistry, leaders among the players etc… if it were
11/13/21 8:04pm
11/13/21 8:07pm