My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
May 13, 2022
1:00
:14
pm
Florwood
All-American
Great point. SLC is lowballing the cost,
So I imagine they are setting themselves up to fail.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Florwood
Bio page
Florwood
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Last login
May 1, 2024
Total posts
26,602 (74 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Came across an interesting stat in my work today. Since 2011 in Utah, there have been 434 fatal crashes of cars versus
SingleStrapBackpack
Truly Addicted User
5/13/22 11:20am
Don’t tell me what to do.
CrimWalCoug
5/13/22 11:31am
Do you have a link to that study?
pirata
5/13/22 11:58am
It isn't from a study. It's straight out of the crash database that UDOT keeps. However, the reason I saw the figures is
SingleStrapBackpack
5/13/22 12:10pm
Seems like SLC is choosing the wrong solution in lowering res speeds to 20.
Florwood
5/13/22 12:18pm
I think it's the wrong decision because lower speed limits does little to reduce
scottfunkel
5/13/22 12:29pm
It totally depends on how you do it. If you reduce speeds by changing the physical environment to make it feel natural
SingleStrapBackpack
5/13/22 12:55pm
Great point. SLC is lowballing the cost,
Florwood
5/13/22 1:00pm
They'll win public approval points for "doing something," even if that something
scottfunkel
5/13/22 1:05pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad