What you’re not understanding is how irrelevant the P12 is on the national stage. That’s not just “the BYU take”, that’s the view everyone outside of Utah knows and sees about football out west right now.
The very fact that you called Oregon the P12 king, while not having done anything significant since getting blown out by Ohio St. in the 2014 title game, should have knocked some sense into you when you typed it out. (As for The 2014 Oregon team let’s be real, they shouldn’t have even been in the playoffs given they only played against 1 P5 non-conf team. The rest of their wins came via an inflated P12 schedule which gave them false credibility. But I digress.)
To spell it out clearly for you and all your kind, THE PAC12 IS IRRELEVANT ON THE NATIONAL STAGE. No team east of Boulder has been afraid of a school west of the Rockies since USC had Reggie Bush and Matt Leinart. Even Oregon during the Chip Kelly years was seen as nothing more than a gimmicky Boise St. on steroids because of all the money Nike was pumping into the school.
So, congrats on your win streaks against UCLA/AZ/OSU/CU, your 20-22 home wins over the last decade, your PAC12 south titles, etc. You can hang them in your stadium but no one has/will look at them with awe and wonder. They’re as worthless as the ink used to print them. Nobody cares because you did it all MWC-lite schedule against a bunch of has been teams still holding on to the “conference of champions” mantra that was earned from success they had pre-2000 (of which 2 of the top 3 schools that built that conference moniker are no longer going to be affiliated with the P12). Utah has only helped to further bury whatever relevance that conference had by actually winning it last year. It showed anyone that cared to look just how far the blue bloods had fallen and how little they cared about the conference… which USC and UCLA decided is not worth having their names associated with anymore.